e: clerks@terrafirmachambers.com
t: +44 (0)131 260 5830
terra firma chambers logo
  • About
  • Our Advocates
  • Areas of Practice
  • Updates
  • Contact
  • About
  • Our Advocates
  • Areas of Practice
  • Updates
  • Contact

Terra Firma Chambers RSS Feed
News

If you wish to receive more information about any developments involving members of Terra Firma Chambers in any of our practice areas please click here.

31
May
2011

Dulce Packard and Others v Scottish Ministers and North British Windpower Ltd

Roy Martin QC and Alasdair Burnet of Terra Firma successfully represented North British Windpower Limited against a petition for judicial review seeking the quashing of consent for its major windfarm at Fallago Rig in the Lammermuir hills.  The application was originally recommended for refusal due to objections from the MOD over potential interference with its radar but, following the withdrawal of objections from the MOD and a second public inquiry, it was approved by Ministers.  The petitioners challenged the Ministers’ decision principally on the grounds that Scottish Government representatives had taken part inappropriately in discussions between the developer and the MOD in order to facilitate the withdrawal of the MOD’s objection and had thereby displayed bias and a pre-determination by the Ministers to grant the consent.  They also claimed that there had been no new evidence justifying the re-opening of the inquiry and that the suspensive radar mitigation conditions attached to the consent were ultra vires.  Lord McEwan found that, as the decision was an administrative one and not a judicial or quasi-judicial one, Ministers were entitled to take into account new information after the closing of the first inquiry and that there was no evidence of bias or pre-determination on the part of the Ministers disclosed in the correspondence.  He also found that the suspensive conditions were appropriate and the petitioners were too late to challenge the findings of the second inquiry by way of judicial review as they had requested it take place, had taken part in it, and had allowed the other parties to take part in it, despite being in possession of all the information on which they subsequently sought to rely on in the petition. The judgement is available here.

go back to the previous page

Archives

  • Aug 2026
  • Jul 2026
  • Jun 2026
  • Mar 2026
  • Feb 2026
  • Jan 2026
  • Nov 2025
  • Oct 2025
  • Sep 2025
  • Aug 2025
  • Jul 2025
  • Jun 2025
  • For older news please click here to visit the Archive.

Contact Info

Address: Parliament House, Edinburgh, EH1 1RF
Telephone: 0131 260 5830
E-mail: clerks@terrafirmachambers.com

Recent Articles & Commentary

  • Common Good Law - The Basics

    The is the text of a talk delivered at the recent Common Good Conference hosted by Terra Firma Chambers in conjunctio...

Follow Us

© Copyright Terra Firma Chambers. All Rights Reserved. Site by Koder.
Home Clerks Links Joining Us